CHEEKS · ILLUSTRATED 3D RECOVERY
Fat Transfer (Nasolabial Folds): before & after and recovery stages
Compare nose-to-mouth fold volume before transfer, through early fullness and later settling.

SUMMARY
What this example shows
Transferred soft-tissue volume partly softens fixed fictional grooves beside the nose and mouth. Early swelling and color fade separately from a smaller later volume addition. The lips, nose and mouth-corner positions stay fixed; the cheek is not lifted. The contour is a comparison example, not an injected amount or a fat-survival prediction.
STAGE BY STAGE
Fat Transfer (Nasolabial Folds) recovery stages
Starting contour
Fixed fictional diagonal grooves beside the nose and mouth provide the same reference at every stage.
The same reference is used at every date and does not diagnose the selected face.
First few days: Volume plus swelling
Temporary fullness and color overlap the added volume.
Recipient swelling and bruising can affect early appearance.
Around 1 month: Fullness easing
Less surface color exposes the evolving contour.
Early appearance is not a measure of retained fat.
Around 6 months: Later volume example
A smaller, smoother addition remains after the temporary response.
Settling and fat retention vary; this date is a comparison point.
TIMELINE
Day-by-day checkpoints in the 3D model
The simulator interpolates between these authored checkpoints. They describe the illustration, not measured clinical averages.
The unchanged display face provides a reference for this example.
Added volume overlaps swelling and local color.
Temporary fullness obscures the underlying volume change.
The local response starts easing in this example.
Less discoloration makes the contour easier to compare.
Remaining fullness is distinct from the later volume example.
The illustrated contour becomes less full over months.
Residual volume remains; its size does not measure fat survival.
This stable display endpoint does not predict aging or future volume.
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
How recovery can vary
Timing and response
Transferred amount, technique and healing affect the course. This surface example omits donor recovery and does not predict fat survival or pigment changes.
Longer term
The one-year view holds the later contour for comparison. Aging, weight changes, irregularities and repeat treatment are not forecast.
EVIDENCE NOTES
Sources and limitations
- PubMed: Facial fat grafting: systematic review
Identifies nasolabial folds and marionette grooves among recipient areas in studies combining fat grafting with facelift surgery. It does not establish a standalone recovery curve or calibrate the displayed grooves and volume.
- Cleveland Clinic: Fat transfer
Temporary swelling and bruising; volume assessment over several months.
KEEP COMPARING
Other cheeks examples
This illustration is not medical advice, diagnosis, a treatment recommendation or a prediction of personal results. Swelling, color, contour and dates are authored examples on a fictional face. BeautiNext is not a clinic; your treating team’s assessment and written recovery plan take priority.